“Systematic Representative Design: A Reply to Commentaries” by Lynn C. Miller, David C. Jeong, Liyuan Wang, Sonia Jawaid Shaikh, Traci K. Gillig, Carlos G. Godoy, Paul R. Appleby, Charisse L. Corsbie-Massay, Stacy Marsella, John L. Christensen, and Stephen J. Read. Psychological Inquiry, vol. 30, no. 4, 2019, pp. 250-263, Routledge. PMID: 33093761.
AbstractSystematic Representative Design (SRD), enabled by todays technologies leverages many of the strengths of past designs into a new synthesis affording the capacity for both causal inference and generalizability to everyday life (GEL). In doing so, it could help better integrate past and ongoing empirical research findings in psychology. Generally, the commentaries were positive and thought-provoking. Delightfully, they gave us new opportunities to both clarify misunderstandings as well as further address the feasibility of this approach.
BibTeX entry:
@article{doi:10.1080/1047840X.2019.1698908,
author = {Lynn C. Miller and David C. Jeong and Liyuan Wang and Sonia
Jawaid Shaikh and Traci K. Gillig and Carlos G. Godoy and Paul R.
Appleby and Charisse L. Corsbie-Massay and Stacy Marsella and John
L. Christensen and Stephen J. Read},
title = {Systematic Representative Design: A Reply to Commentaries},
journal = {Psychological Inquiry},
volume = {30},
number = {4},
pages = {250-263},
publisher = {Routledge},
year = {2019},
note = {PMID: 33093761},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2019.1698908}
}
(This webpage was created with bibtex2web.)
Back to Stacy Marsella.